1. Academic language only please! Students are assessed and /or evaluated and therefore, the change in format does not translate into a change in expectations in terms of the kind of language, phrasing, etc, that is acceptable. This includes refraining from the use of text messaging language systems.
2. Inevitably debate will arise since students are expected to comment on their peers' postings. That said, personal attacks and offensive language and remarks will not be tolerated. If this happens at any point, the class blog will be shut down and serious consequences will follow.
3. Meet deadlines. Each posting comes with a date and time stamp.
4. If students refer to information from other websites in your postings, the expectation for citing your resources remains the same. At the end of your posting, always include the URL for any sites that are referred to in the posting, in addition to proper citation within the text, depending on the teacher's preference.
5. Students are asked not to share the blog's URL with their friends. The class blog is for students in
English 1DY-a and b classes only.
6. Parents will be made aware of the URL and a notice to parents in advance to using the blog in class will be sent.
7. Administration (along with the Department Head of English) will be made aware of the URL and be made aware that this software will be used in our course.
6. Parents will be made aware of the URL and a notice to parents in advance to using the blog in class will be sent.
7. Administration (along with the Department Head of English) will be made aware of the URL and be made aware that this software will be used in our course.
Christina Bisol
ReplyDeleteI remember picking up this book in Chapters about a year ago and thinking how depressing it must be if a novel about a nine year old boy was not simply intended for children. When I finally read it this semester I was reminded of this initial thought, which flourished into many other reactions as I progressed through it. Bruno’s going to die; what does this have to do with pajamas; I hope this isn’t similar to Schindler’s List, to name a few. Overall, I was filled with curiosity and sorrow for the upcoming chapters.
This comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteDana Condescu
DeleteThe contrast of innocence in this young boy compared to the situation around him is confusing. In fact, it is confusing enough to draw readers in by curiosity. As the events in the novel played out one by one, I pieced together all the information to form a big puzzle. The little pieces of innocence formed a vast and tragic scene. The theme of this novel may not be intended for a younger audience, but the perspective and style of writing allows children to connect with the main character, Bruno.
Overall, I believe the novel was well written and made me feel as if I was in the shoes of a nine year old boy living in this era. It made me frustrated and pained when Bruno misinterpreted situations, and how this never allowed him to see the truth behind what his father had been doing as a soldier. This book helped me grasp the idea of what kind of lifestyle the people during the Holocaust had, giving me glimpses of the level of cruelty the Jews had to endure. I can honestly say that I enjoyed reading this novel.
ReplyDeleteJuan Leikis
DeleteI agree that it is frustrating to see Bruno misinterpreting things, but all of this leads to him maturing. Though it does not make much of a change to his character, it is still very noticeable when he does show signs of understanding, for example feeling sympathy for Shmuel. These signs of understanding lead him away from his selfish behaviour seen at the beginning of the novel, as he begins to show compassion, e.g. giving Schmuel food as he understood that he was in pain from starvation. However, some misunderstandings do more good than bad, as the lack of knowledge of the war results in him being highly invulnerable to the brainwashing tactics of the Nazi party, as he does not know about the war farther than his father being an esteemed commandant.
Kyra Disimino
DeleteHi Sabrina, I very much agree with the fact that it caused frustration and pain regarding the obliviousness of Bruno, and knowing things he does not know, like the fact that his own father is a Nazi, or even anything about the holocaust in general. This was probably one of the most significant parts of the novel to me personally, considering it is when I felt most sympathetic for the naive young boy Bruno cannot help but be, and it really helped me to connect to his character.
Alvin Pane
DeleteI was also very frustrated when Bruno misinterpreted the situations. Knowing the truth about everything that was going on made me feel sad that Bruno could not know the truth as well. Bruno was just caught up in something that he could not possibly understand, and his obliviousness led to his death. Bruno's innocence in dying is really symbolic in showing the horrors of the Holocaust. So many lives were needlessly lost just as Bruno's was. Boyne does an excellent job of portraying this and making the reader emotional, making for a very good novel.
Andre Dao
DeleteSabrina, it's interesting that you mentioned that you as a reader feel pity and frustration for Bruno. I would like to add that it is very ironic that we would feel pity for the son of a Nazi soldier during the Holocaust rather than a Jew. Boyne's idea of making the reader feel pity for a Nazi family gives us a different perspective which is a nice change.
Dana Condescu
ReplyDeleteUsing a young and innocent boy’s perspective in a situation like the Holocaust is very contrasting and unique. It made me think twice about those who are not oppressed, but not exactly the antagonists either. Bruno is oblivious to what is going on around him. He sees his life as an adventure and is not aware of the misfortunes of others, yet he is expected to be the enemy. It is eye opening to see a hidden perspective that no one pays attention to, and it reminded me that not all the Germans approved of or knew about this event.
Erin Ford
DeleteI agree with you Dana. The perspective of an innocent child, who stays innocent throughout the entire novel, is one I would never have thought of in relation to the holocaust. This novel informs reader that not all Germans had bad intentions and really brings them to question the concept of good vs evil. This book manages to talk about a very sensitive topic while being pro German and without being pro Nazi or anti Jewish.
Chinonso Ekeanyanwu
DeleteI agree that Bruno's perspective was a huge part of th novel and truly made it what it was. But don't you think that Bruno might have, subconsciously, known what was going on? Because we see in the novel who he feels uncomfortable when talking to Shmuel about some of these things.
Milena Fortino
ReplyDeleteIn previous years when others told me about this novel,I found the premise of this book quite depressing, somber and not relatable. However, upon reading and analyzing the novel, I realized this novel is well written and intriguing. The method in which the author used by writing the novel through the perception of a young, innocent and naive child assisted me to develop a feeling of sentiment and sympathy towards the protagonist, Bruno and what he must endure and witness. It also helped me visualize the horrendous conditions and treatment Jews received. The way in which the author utilized specific motifs including the fence (segregation) as well as, the window (the unknown) was extremely creative but also reflective of the innocence of children and the heinous Holocaust.
Teodora Marginean
DeleteHi Milena,
Before reading the novel, I had the exact same thoughts as you; I didn’t want to read it because of its dark themes and heartbreaking ending and instead opted for books with a positive outcome. However, even after having studied The Boy in the Striped Pyjamas, I still find it hard to relate with the main characters. Although I did sympathize with the Shmuel’s hardships and Bruno’s misfortune, their situation is unlike anything I’ve ever experienced. Our problems are far less serious than those of World War II. This book did leave me devastated, but it feels selfish to say I can connect my issues to theirs.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteShadia Adekunte
ReplyDeleteWhen I was first introduced to The Boy in the Striped Pajamas, I initially thought that the book would not be as interesting as it is. When you actually read and analyze it, you come to understand that there is so much that you can actually relate to. I also think that Boyne was a genius to think of making the book from the perspective of a young child during the Holocaust. The innocence and naivety of young Bruno at the beginning of the book makes for a delightfully heart-wrenching story that captivates the mind of any and every reader.
I agree, I did sense that heart-wrenching moment at the realization of "Out-With", and the realization of Bruno's and Shmuel's deaths at the end of the second last chapter. It seemed like a novel just like any other but by the middle of the book I began to be captivated by the plot of the story that was being told.
DeleteKyra Disimino
DeleteHi Shadia, I understand and agree with your views regarding the first uninteresting impression of the book; from the brief introduction and setting description and detail, to the easy level of read this book is, it did not seem very intriguing . However, Boyne did not need that in his writing to show depth of this story line, and I believe it was better that this book was written as simple as the mind of Bruno, because it further enhances the readers understanding of how simple minded he truly is. This book did captivate me, and I agree that it was a thoroughly eye-opening read.
Daniel Morelli
ReplyDeleteWhen I was reading this novel, I noticed the importance of Bruno’s personality. When I finished the novel, I realized that Bruno personality resulted in his death. Bruno’s naivety, curiosity, and sense of exploration influenced his decision to explore the other side of the fence, which led to his own demise. Curiosity did indeed kill the cat. As I was reading the novel, I noticed this novel was well written. Writing in the perspective of the child, the author utilized symbols and motifs such as the fence to develop the conflict between the Jews and the Germans, and to develop themes. I am very appreciative to have the opportunity to read this novel.
Milena Fortino
DeleteHi Daniel,
I completely agree with what you mentioned regarding Bruno’s attributes and how his character flaws including blindness, innocence and naivete ultimately lead to his untimely demise. Due to his tender age, Bruno has absolutely no idea about the divide between the Jews and the Germans and the critical conflicts that had arose in view of this hatred towards each other. He is sheltered from the world as he lived a privileged life as a son of a German soldier; however others around him attempt to explain the feud between the Germans and Jews in subtle and childlike ways, yet he is too innocent to grasp this concept and can’t fathom where the loathing stemmed from. Bruno disregards these prejudices and manages to befriend Shmuel, a Jew. The fence acts as a barrier between fantasy and reality; on one side of the fence, Bruno’s family receives lavish treatment where as, on the opposite side Shmuel and the other Jews are treated like vermin and made to feel inferior. Eventually, this obliviousness lead to Bruno perishing with his new friend, Shmuel.
Erin Ford
ReplyDeleteIn Grade seven my class had the choice to read The Boy in the Striped Pajamas from a list of books, so before I opened the book I knew from my classmates’ reactions it was going to be very heartbreaking. This initial thought proved correct as by the end of the novel I had gained a new perspective of the Holocaust. After I finished the book I realized that John Boyne enabled me to feel frustration, pity, amusement, curiosity, and anger, as well as sadness. I believe this book is brilliantly written, and is important to society today.
Christina Bisol
DeleteThe amount of emotions one can have from a novel is truly amazing. The fact that the story about a nine year old brought youth into the reader’s perspective and triggered a different way to reflect on the holocaust. Normally, one may dwell on the soldier’s cruelty, not on the fact that they may have families, or how hard the prisoners would be panicking from the knowledge that they could die any day. Few people would take into account the interpretations of children on either side of the fence. John Boyne reminded us of this, that the hardships took place on both sides.
Dana Condescu
DeleteThe Holocaust is a tragic event, and it is a given that any story about it will evoke emotions of sadness or pity. It is also very inspiring to know that in a novel about an event as tragic as this, the feelings of amusement and curiosity can still come into play. John Boyne manages to write this from such a perspective as to introduce hope and a strong friendship into a battlefield; a friendship that eliminates boundaries and hatred.
Chinonso Ekeanyanwu
DeleteI agree completely that the book is heartbreaking. When Bruno and Shmuel die you feel the pain. They are little boys and innocent boys at that. They were just sucked up into the fights of their fathers and their fathers. I also agree that it presents an important message but what message do you think it presents?
Thomas Qu
ReplyDeleteWhen I first picked up this book I realised that it would have a remotely sad ending as it was related to the Holocaust. I did enjoy how the author attempted to hide the actual setting of the book by utilising the nativity of a 9 year old boy. Using a little boy’s perspective of the holocaust was very unique and it intrigued me to continue reading through the entire book. My only question was how Bruno did not know the actual extent of his father’s occupation even though his father is such a highly respected member of the Nazi Regime and he aspires to be like him?
Juan Leikis
DeleteTo answer your question, Bruno is nave. As a 9 year old boy, he shows several signs of this nature, as you mentioned the author hiding the name of the location by using Bruno’s naivety. This shows that Boyne intended for Bruno to be naïve, which cannot end at mispronouncing Auschwitz, and results in him knowing very little about the war, as the definition for being naïve is showing lack of experience, wisdom, or judgement. It is also mentioned in the novel that Bruno is not sure why his father is called a commandant, and that he wanted to be a soldier like his father, as he does not know the exact role that his father plays. Therefore, Bruno is a naive 9 year old who lacks knowledge of the war, which results in his lack of knowledge of his father position and what it contains, and he aspires to be like because the soldiers that are around, along with his mother and grandfather, glorify his rank because they were taught that what he was doing was right.
Charlotte Bartos
ReplyDeleteI think this book is well written and it made me feel as if I were in the book in Bruno's shoes. This book was very depressing to read because of all the racism that the German's had towards the Jews. Since I have previously read this novel before, I think that when I read it again for this assignment, I think that I could analyze it more and I felt even more depressed as I read it. I feel bad for Schmuel but also I feel bad for Bruno because he doesn't understand what Schmuel is going through.
Elena Ricci
DeleteHi Charlotte,
I agree it is extremely depressing to read about racism and all the different types of hatred people had towards each other. It was reassuring to see that humans were not born like this. Given the example between Bruno and Shmuel relationship, they still became great friends despite the environment they were in. Yes, it was very frustrating and upsetting that Bruno in spite of everything his family was and stood for, he still did not comprehend what exactly Shumel and everyone on the other side of the fence was going through. But yet, I think it was better that Bruno did not understand his family’s involvement in the Holocaust, since he was a young child and it would hurt and scar him.
Anisa Thomas
DeleteHi Charlotte, I agree with you because I also feel that I am in Bruno’s shoes. Bruno’s life in Out-With is one big adventure and the author makes us feel a part of it. This makes for an interesting plot and great writing like you said. Yes, this book is depressing but I think the author makes it intentional so we can learn a lesson. Therefore readers should ask them self what can they learn from Bruno and the horrid events that take place. This is my second time watching the movie and I have to say I learn many more meaningful things the second time around.
I find it quite amazing and odd at the same time that the readers are able to feel sympathy towards Bruno and Shmuel, and to a certain extent understand their situations, but Bruno seems to not be able to fully understand or feel much sympathy for Shmuel. Other than the point in the novel when Bruno denied to the lieutenant that Shmuel was his friend and Bruno felt bad for him when he saw that he had been beaten; though Bruno did not understand that Shmuel had been beaten. In other words I agree with you that the book was well written, and it truly was depressing to read of such a horrid situation, especially when you realize that such things could have actually happened in reality.
DeleteChinonso Ekeanyanwu
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed the novel, especially the end. The author delivered it so that we knew it was coming but we dreaded it. It sent a strong message to us and the characters. Bruno didn't deserve to die but he needed to. I also loved how the book was written in 3rd person but centered around Bruno's views. The author commented on this saying he wanted to approach this subject in a way that is inoffensive by using a child's perspective but he also wanted to ground the readers so that the harsh realities are seen. In other words, simply brilliant!
Isabella Fortuna
DeleteI also really appreciated this novel, particularly the end. I believe the reader did know what was awaiting Bruno at the conclusion of the story, especially through quotes such as “All in all, it seemed like a very sensible plan and a good way to say goodbye.” (Boyne, 199) which seemed very sarcastic and used the literary device of dramatic irony. I agree that Bruno needed to meet his death to complete the novel and to make it more impactful and meaningful to the reader. The fact that Bruno was not deserving of this fate is what makes it even more powerful as no person, regardless of race, ethnicity, religion etc., deserves to be treated in such an inhumane way.
Hi Chinonso,
DeleteI agree with you, the book was simply brilliant. The message sent to us was delivered in a very sad, but important way. Death seems to be the only way for people to realize what is going on around them. Which is why Boyne's ending was very efficient. I also liked how he wrote the book. When he put the book through the view of a child, it adds a greater affect than if the book were to be written through the eyes of an adult. Overall, I agree it was a very incredible book.
Andre Dao
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed the novel and the tragic ending left me with a renewed sense of pity for those involved in the Holocaust. However, I find it very questionable that the son of a Nazi commandant constantly surrounded by military officers does not know who Hitler is and even believes “Heil Hitler” is a casual way to end a conversation. Although Bruno is a naive seven-year-old child, I still believe there is a limit to how much he could be shielded from the events around his home and a real child in his position would not be so oblivious.
Tony Vu
ReplyDeleteThe Boy In Stripped Pajamas was very intriguing and interesting to me. Most of the chapters ended with a cliff hanger and the choices Bruno made were unexpected for me. I believed that Bruno was a good boy that would listen to anything he was told to do, but as the story continued, I noticed that Bruno broke more rules. The story was told from an innocent little boy's perspective, forcing me to ask different questions; What’s going on on the other side of the fence? What will he do now? Will his curiosity get him killed? Overall, I enjoyed the unique book!
Victoria Battaglia
DeleteHi Tony,
I agree with your concept of each chapter ending with a cliff hanger. It made you want to continue reading onto the next chapter to see what Bruno would do. Each chapter evoked many different emotions, especially near the end when Bruno dies. I think that Bruno's curiosity influences his opinion about his father's job and he begins to realise what his father does for a living. This would include killing most of the Jewish race including his best friend Shmuel.
Joseph Sereney
DeleteTony, I agree with the fact that The Boy in the Striped Pajamas was very enticing. Also, the way the author does end every chapter with a cliffhanger only makes the reader want to continue with the book. We want to know what happens next. I, too, was baffled by the change in Bruno’s attitude and how he suddenly breaks the rules. I thought some of the same questions. Boyne always leaves the reader wanting to know more about what is actually happening on the other side of the fence.
Sara Corvinelli
ReplyDeleteReading the novel evoked many thoughts and feelings. My initial reaction was of deep sadness at having to read of the senseless acts against the Jewish race. Despite this, the author captivated my attention by using a young boy, Bruno, as the protagonist. Even though we are faced with his tragic death, we are left with hope that his father will repent his wrongful actions. Ultimately, he was not able to recognize and stand against the atrocities that surrounded him. Whereas, Bruno was able to see beyond the hatred and discrimination. This left me with optimism for humanity.
Victoria Battaglia
DeleteHi Sara,
I had the same perspective as you about Bruno. I think his curiosity made him develop throughout the book, such as when he first met Shmuel. I think at the beginning of the book, Bruno did not have much liberty, however, when his family moved to the 'Out-With', they didn't pay much attention to him. His curiosity made him see beyond the disgraceful brutality of the Jews.
Anisa Thomas
DeleteHey Sara, I agree with your response. I also believe Bruno is the perfect protagonist because his death leads to his Father’s repentance. This is a very important aspect in the novel because ultimately only Bruno’s death can change his father’s perspective. The whole family is scarred with their son’s death which is okay because finally they realize the Jews are humans like the rest of society. Unfortunately racism is huge problem but this book gives me hope because we can all learn the lesson Bruno’s father learns. Even though Bruno’s death is sad, I am very touched with the message it has to offer.
Nicolette Gismondi
DeleteHey, I agree with your post. I think Bruno’s father should realize that their actions are very cruel. Now that his own son died from the Nazi brutality the father should now be able to understand how the Jewish feel when there loved ones are killed. Also Bruno captivated my attention because of his fun loving personality and I thought it brought the story to life. I as well had the initial reaction of deep sadness but then realized that the main focus was about Bruno and Shmuel’s relationship.
Mark Francis Olaya
ReplyDeleteThis book was quite interesting to read since this was from a young immature German boy’s perspective during World War 2 who had a father that was part of the German army. I have not seen nor heard of any other books that were based on the non-Jewish German perspective during the Holocaust. My interest in World War 2 history has given me a greater fascination for The Boy in the Striped Pajamas. The use of words, descriptive scenery, and the realistic childish, curious personality of Bruno has drawn my attention to this novel even more. I have already read this book before, but even in the past and now the present, I have asked myself, why did not Bruno’s parents increase security around their house and tell Bruno what is happening in the real world, outside his comfortable illusionary shelter. If these were included, Bruno’s childhood would have been obliterated, but at least it would not have led to an unfortunate death. Overall, this novel was exquisitely enjoyable to read twice and I would like to read another of Boyne’s works.
Teresa Raso
ReplyDeleteMy initial thought on The Boy in the Stripped Pajamas was pure sadness and compassion for the many individuals involved in the Holocaust. I enjoyed the author’s style of writing and her creative plot. We have all heard many stories on the Holocaust but I have never heard one based on the point of view of a soldiers son. The relationship between Bruno and Shmuel had such a special and strong bond that was truly touching to watch. Overall I thought the plot and the characters had a great impact on the audience.
Friendship is the most important thing in life and Bruno proved it in the story when he, against all odds, was willing to cross a physical barrier in order to be with his friend Shmuel. Although the plot is about the atrocities that the Jews had to endure, Boyne adds a deeper meaning to the story by emphasizing the power of friendship. The strong bond of a true friendship cannot be broken or divided simply by a physical barrier. It is amazing how the two young characters, from very different cultures and backgrounds, were able to connect and enjoy each other’s company until death. It is quite impressive how the two young boys teach us all an important message: despite our differences, we are all God's children.
DeleteI found it fascinating that such a horrible event in history is hidden from Bruno's eyes. The innocence and immaturity of Bruno is what leads to his demise as information is kept from his throughout the novel. I do believe that Shmuel and Bruno had the strongest of bonds because at their darkest time in their life, they stayed together. The author's simple way of writing brought forth a fresh perspective. Overall, I, alike you, enjoyed the novel.
DeleteHey Teresa,
DeleteI agree that this novel was very sad but it taught me a lot of what people from that time were experiencing in their lives. The book being from the point of view of Bruno, a young German boy, gave a different perspective and was interesting to read as he became friends with Shmuel, two people who would not normally be friends if it were not for their innocence and naivety. I also enjoyed the novel and thought that it was written very well.
Joseph Sereney
ReplyDeleteI think this book is different from other Holocaust stories, and in a good way. The perspective that John Boyne gives the reader is very new and enticing, as we are put into the shoes of a young German boy named Bruno. His small but impactful journey leaves the reader with something to think about. I like how most of the chapters are short and also end leave me wanting to know more. I also like the friendship between Bruno and Shmuel and how the author portrays it, as both boys’ innocence only makes their shared fate sadder.
In my opinion, the innocence of Shmuel was non existent compared to that of Bruno. Many a time in the novel it hints at Shmuel knowing about the horrible things that the soldiers are doing, but Bruno disagrees and Shmuel doesn't argue back.
DeleteDoreen Sangaraganesan
DeleteI agree with Ornello. Shmuel often seems like he is hinting at the cruel things that happen in the camp, and he speaks with an underlying tone of wisdom. He is more affected by the Holocaust and it shows in the way he speaks. Bruno on the other hand is ignorant and oblivious to the thing Schmuel suggest often listening to himself, instead of having to face the reality that lies in front of him.
Quite frankly, I did not particularly enjoy the author’s style of writing in the novel. At times I found it difficult to read because of awkward descriptions and over-use of certain words and phrases. Although I believe this was done intentionally to add effect, I think that the novel would be better if it was written formally. The message and plot of the story is quite touching. I believe a significant message in the novel is the biblical principle, “the sins of the father shall be visited upon the son”. Bruno’s father’s sins ultimately resulted in Bruno’s demise. ~Leighton Ashton Costanzo
ReplyDeleteClaudia Miele
ReplyDeleteSomething that stood out to me after I read The Boy In The Striped Pajamas was that the perspective of the son of a soldier was a very fresh take on the Holocaust. In my opinion Bruno's interactions with his father resembled that of soldiers, it was very severe and impersonal. The setting of Bruno's upbringing lacked love and tenderness, which ultimately played a role in his death. However, I found the idea of book to be a little unrealistic because it is unbelievable that any parent would let their nine-year-old child live beside a concentration camp.
Hello Claudia,
DeleteI, alike you, thought the perspective of the son of a lead solder was a very fresh take on the holocaust. I disagree with you with the fact that the story is unrealistic. I do believe that a young child has actually lived beside a camp unaware of the situation. Bruno's father thought it was safe for Bruno to be there because of the fences put up and how it is hinted that they are a long walk away from it. Bruno's father was also naive and did not think that what was happening was bad. Bruno's mother disagreed with his father and they eventually decided to move back to Berlin after Bruno's father realized the negative impact this camp has inflicted on Bruno's life.
Sabrina Pullano
DeleteI agree that it was interesting to read a story from a young boy’s perspective in the Holocaust era. However, I disagree with the idea that Bruno’s upbringing lacked love and tenderness. I believe that although he was raised in a place so up-close and involved with his father’s work, he was surrounded by the love and tenderness of his family (ex. from his mother and sister). The reader is able to see this when we can relate to the family’s relationships, such as Bruno and Gretel’s love/hate relationship; how they argue at times but always love each other.
I disagree with your point about Bruno's upbringing and the lack of love from his family. Bruno's mother and Maria evidently cared for him and worried about him throughout the story and even in the movie it was clear that his mother wanted nothing more than to keep him safe. I definitely agree with your idea that the story was unrealistic because if Bruno's caregivers truly wanted to keep him safe and wanted the best for him, they would not have allowed a nine year old to live within such short distance of a concentration camp.
DeleteKyra Disimino
ReplyDeleteThe boy in the striped pajamas was truly a very eye-opening read, and I have received plenty of information on the Holocaust in my lifetime – being a rather tremendously important part of history – however, I have never heard a story quite like Bruno’s. Initially and throughout, I found this book frustrating to read, because the naivety and obliviousness of Bruno, yet lovable character, caused so much controversy out of his pure incapability to comprehend the events occurring around him, being only nine years old and unknowingly surrounded by the horrific events of the Holocaust. The perception of a young boy in that situation thoroughly deepened my understanding of the awful events that transpired, and the cruel way in which the Nazi’s segregated Jewish people from the rest of society.
Victoria Battaglia
ReplyDeleteMy initial assumption of The Boy in the Striped Pajamas was pity and melancholy towards the Jews involved in the Holocaust. I've read numerous books associated with the Holocaust such as Daniel's Story, and having the ability to see the point of view from a German boy named Bruno, presents the reader with a different view of the Holocaust in opposed to the view from a Jew. One particular part of the book I enjoyed was the pure innocence in Bruno's and Shmuel's friendship due to the fact that despite being completely opposite, a friendship is bloomed between a Jewish and German boy within that period.
Elena Ricci
DeleteHi Victoria,
I agree completely, most people including myself thought that the Holocaust mainly affected the Jews and not the Germans who were causing the pain. However, not all the people in Germany hated the Jewish people, and because of this, they suffered as well. The friendship between Bruno and Shmuel was curious, since they were opposites yet so very similar. It reminds me of a mirror, they are reflections of each other in different cultures German, and Jewish. The two boys can look at each other and see what their life can be like if they were born Jewish or German.
Hey Vittoria…(that's the correct spelling ;) )
DeleteI also have read Daniel's story. It was sad just like TBITSP, but at least it did not end with the main character dying. you are completely right with not everyone hating the Jews. That shows that at least some people in that time had common sense and understood that was Hitler was doing was wrong. I also liked your comparison between Bruno and Shmuel. It is very right, they are like opposites of each (as far as social standing and race in concerned) they are FOIL characters.
Sara Corvinelli
DeleteHi Victoria, I too, felt great sympathy and sadness for the Jewish people who suffered greatly in the Holocaust. It is hard to understand and process the extent of the evil acts that were inflicted on them. I agree that we, the readers, were exposed to a different perspective to this part of history. Capturing the events through the eyes of a young German boy, Bruno, grasped my attention from the start. I too enjoyed watching his friendship blossom with Shmuel, despite their diverse backgrounds.
Adam Packer
ReplyDeleteThis novel was beautifully written. While reading it I truly felt as though I was in the shoes of Bruno. His innocence and immaturity hid the reality of the situation. The author made me develop a feeling of sympathy and sentiment towards Bruno. I felt frustrated whenever Bruno was unable to understand a situation because it seemed so obvious to me. Overall, I am extremely glad that such an entertaining and interesting book was picked out for grade 9 PACE, and I hope future generations will also enjoy the book I enjoyed.
Isabella Fortuna
DeleteI agree that this novel was excellent and Bruno’s naivety contrasted the harsh reality of the war. However, I believe it was John Boyne’s intention to make what was truly happening obvious to the reader but very confusing and complicated to the innocent eyes of a 9-year old boy. Although the reality is obvious to us now that we have historical records, it was not obvious to all the members of the society at the time since many people were kept “in the dark” as to what was really occurring in the concentration camps through false propaganda and dishonest messages from the Nazis.
Joseph Sereney
DeleteI agree that this novel was very well written and it’s obvious that the author knew a lot about the topic. I think that his descriptions of Bruno’s journey are extremely vivid, and that they are meant to be like that to truly show Bruno’s innocence. There are many parts of the book where we become frustrated with Bruno for not realizing the obvious, but Boyne does this to show us not only how sad Bruno’s story is, but how cruel and dishonest the Nazi regime was at the time.
Adam, I do not think the novel was well written at all. For such mature content, the style of writing was juvenile. The over use of "Hopeless Case" was irritating and with the simple descriptions I overall felt as though the writing was aimed at junior grades. However, I also think Bruno's naivety was annoying at some points. Everyone around Bruno, including Gretel who was only three years older than him, understood the situation. Also, Bruno's tutor practically spelled it out for him, which made it very frustrating that he still couldn't understand what the camp was and what the Nazis did.
DeleteTeresa Raso
DeleteHi Adam
I agree that the author’s choice to make Bruno's character so innocent to his surroundings hid the reality of the situation. Although having much previous knowledge on the topic of the Holocaust and the extent of pain the Jews went through, I like Bruno did not understand what was happening to "the farms in the stripped pajamas". This novel was not based on the terrible events that went on during this time, and therefore helped me to see the situation from Bruno’s innocent point of view. The author did not write this book to inform us but to focus on the unique characters and their special relationships. I agree that this book helped the audience view the story from Bruno’s point of view.
Elena Ricci
ReplyDeleteGenerally, I found the novel a perfect story about friendship, lies and the Holocaust. It reveals the innoncence of young children and the cruelty of the Germans towards the Jews. The novel compares the two conflicting points through the eyes of nine year old Bruno. Boyne made me feel sympathetic towards this tragic tale Bruno who did not comprehend his family's involvement in the Holocaust. This made me feel depressed, confused, and powerless.When i finshed reading the novel I was curious about what Bruno's reaction would be if he truely understood his father's role in Auschwitz.
Hi Elena,
DeleteI completely agree with you about the many themes of the novels. I believe that Boyne has portrayed the different messages of the book by using the innocence of a nine-year old. Boyne used Bruno’s limited knowledge and poor experience to further prove the message. I also felt the same emotions as you did, while reading the book. Bruno’s cluelessness made us feel sympathetic and powerless. I agree with you on how people think depending on how they are raised. It makes me think what would happen if Shmuel and Bruno were raised differently. I too, enjoyed reading the intriguing book.
Teresa Raso
DeleteHi Elena,
I agree that the author makes the audience feeling sympathetic for Bruno’s lack of knowledge towards the events at this time, especially because of his father involvement. I find this to be quite usual that he doesn’t suspect anything, but this shows the lack of communication between him and his father. I disagree that the novel portrays the cruelty towards the Jews and I thought the novel was more based on Bruno and Shmuel’s special relationship. Since they are from such opposite families and situations but yet so similar in character, it gives the story a unique plot and twist on such a common tale. It was interesting to read a novel from the point of view of two nine year old boys who live such different lives, almost as if they were in two separate worlds. What truly saddens me is how both Bruno and Shmuel are hidden from the truth, but also Bruno’s resistance to believe that his father is apart of the horrible events that happen to these Jews.
Sabrina Pullano
DeleteI agree that the novel goes into great depths on the topics of friendship, cruelty, etc. However, I disagree with the idea of how Bruno was completely blind and oblivious to the fact that his father was involved in the Holocaust. The reader sees his understanding of this develop throughout the novel. When Bruno describes how much he admires his father as a soldier it shows his lack of understanding. However, the reader notices his development of understanding when towards the end of the book; Bruno becomes angry and confused when talking to Shmuel about the work of the soldiers.
Alessia Schembri
ReplyDeleteIn my opinion, The Boy in the Striped Pajamas was a good novel and was very well written. I felt that the book portrayed the time and living conditions of those living in Europe during World War II very realistic and gave me a better understanding of their history. The story left me more interested and informed about the history of the time and I feel grateful for being able to live in a much safer time and place. Bruno's thoughts and opinions were based on how he was raised in a family where his father was a German solider, which may have contrasted Shmuel's opinion as well as mine at some points in the novel. Overall, I enjoyed reading this novel and I learned a lot.
Elisa Locantore
DeleteHi Alessia,
I do agree with you that this is a spectacular novel and that the author, John Boyne, wrote the novel with much detail and emotion. The Boy in the Striped Pajamas allows the reader to vividly imagine the difficult struggle of living in that part of history and how secretive Shmuel and Bruno’s meetings had to be in fear of soldiers finding out and possibly killing them. During our generation we do take in for granted the important things such as; food, water, shelter, clothing and freedom. This novel leaves the reader with many thoughts of appreciation and gratitude. I do agree with you that Bruno’s thoughts and opinions did contrast Shmuel’s and the reader’s opinion as well. When Shmuel first heard that Bruno’s father was a soldier I felt that Shmuel was much more aware of his surroundings and what he would say to Bruno. Once I had concluded the novel I questioned how it would be if it was written in Shmuel’s perspective…
Hi Alessia,
DeleteI agree with you. I felt that the way the author wrote the novel, using words that Bruno would have used, was a very good technique. It shows how Bruno didn't know that he was supposed to hate Shmuel because he was a Jew. To him, Shmuel was just a regular boy that he ended becoming friends with. It also shows that their was no difference between them, other than their cultures. The boys found things in common and played together as all children would. Most novels have been written in the eyes of Jews living through the harsh conditions of World War II, but in the eyes of a young boy from the side doing the harm, we are able to see how innocent Bruno was. Bruno was oblivious to what his father was doing to Shmuel and the other Jews. In his eyes, he and Shmuel were equal.
I enjoyed the novel too. I learned more than I expected.
- Julia Isgro
Elisa Locantore
ReplyDeleteThe Boy in the Striped Pajamas is a novel I had countless feelings on. I was very baffled when Bruno said “Out-With” and what it actually meant. It took me a long time to realize that it was his way of saying “Auschwitz.” I found it ironic that both Shmuel and Bruno coincidently were the same age and had the same birthday, I understand this was to represent their similarity but I still found it ironic. At the end of the novel I was emotional when Bruno and Shmuel died in the gas chamber together. Overall, I loved this novel and the way that the author wrote it. I do question what exactly was wrong with Bruno’s mother.
Christina Bisol
DeleteI too, had a similar problem with understanding that “Out-With” was really “Auschwitz.” I believe that the irony of the two boys having the same birthday preceded to them having identical deaths as well. This, however, was much more ironic because Bruno’s father is the one who inflicts these untimely deaths, only to have his son be part of the misfortune. I believe the ambiguity of Bruno’s mother was only perceived because of the perspective the book was written—and innocent, ignorant nine year old. These ironic situations, Bruno’s oblivious point of view, and even the events themselves inevitably result in a swirling pit of emotions, especially empathy.
Nicolette Gismondi
ReplyDeleteI found The Boy In The Striped Pajamas an astonishing novel. Even though the book was based on a tough era I found the author wrote it with such depth. I felt I could really connect with Bruno and feel what he was feeling. I did not expect the two main characters to die at the end and when they did I felt really upset. The Boy In The Striped Pajamas was the best novel we read this year and is something I would read again. When reading the novel I noticed that it was not just about the Holocaust but the relationship that developed between the two main characters.
I think that this book was intended to show that even though people are different rachises, they can still get along. I just found it upsetting that Bruno always talked about himself to Schmuel. I found that he didn't understand Schmuel because he probably thought that he was just like him. I felt more bad for Bruno than Schmuel because he just couldn't understand. I think in the end, when Bruno and Schmuel went to the gas chambers, was the authors way of saying if you judge people because they believe in a different religion, than something bad will come out of it, so in the end I think it was a good thing that they ended up dying because it showed the Bruno's father that the concentration camp wasn't just for the Jews.
DeleteNicolas Bottger
ReplyDeletePersonally, upon reading the The Boy in the Striped Pajamas, I felt unsatisfied by the minor lack of detail in most scenes. Many scenes did not have a specified description, creating vagueness throughout the plot. I, nonetheless, still enjoyed the story, as I found it to prove that although innocence is wonderful in others' eyes, it will have harmful consequences for he who is naive. Furthermore, I though that the novel was rather simple to comprehend, yet it did have some advanced material which could create different conclusions from the text when well analyzed. All in all, I did like the book, yet I never understood the meaning of Bruno's constant reference to his sister as a Hopeless Case and why the author made it a recurring topic.
Yes, I never understood why the author chose to reference Bruno's sister as a Hopeless Case that amount of times. The book must refer to Bruno's sister as a Hopeless Case 20+ times. I found that to be poor writing.
DeleteI do not think it is poor writing at all. After all there is a reason for everything in every novel. An author does not simply just put in something to their book so it can just be there. I believe Bruno refers to Gretel as a Hopeless Case first of all because Boyne emphasizes the innocence of children and how they only describe things using certain words that they hear the people around them use, just like how "some people" is used by Bruno after he hears his mother repeat it several times about his father. Bruno does not know any other words to describe Gretel and finds that Hopeless Case is the best way to describe her, as he trusts the opinions of others thinking that adults always know what they are talking about. Second of all the use of Hopeless Case may be repeated to express the lack of trust and hope one may have in Gretel. Gretel in a way proves to deceive those around her because of her following others, and not leading her own way through life. She constantly changes her character as she goes through certain "phases", and in a sense, the reader can acknowledge that a person who keeps on changing their mind, is unpredictable, and thus a Hopeless Case. This is my opinion , it may not have to be correct but this is how I perceive Boyne's perspective.
DeleteIt may have been done intentionally, in fact, I am sure that it was done intentionally. However, after being repeated several times, I found it to be annoying. I was anticipating the author to call Bruno's sister a "Hopeless Case" throughout the novel. Twice was plenty enough for me. The style of the novel may appeal to some people, but I found it awkward and even painful to read at times. I would have preferred it if the author had just said "Bruno's sister/Gretel" and left it at that. Instead, the author went out of his was to include "Hopeless Case" again and again, even at the point when the description was planted in the readers' brain.
DeleteThe fact that the name became planted in your head after reading it so many times sounds to me like Boyne was trying to subtly show how propaganda was administered back then. Although there was an uneasy feeling centered around the mystery of the Nazi's work, the Germans had heard of it so often it became second nature to be surrounded by it and support it. Boyne's simple writing proved much more intricate and powerful than it would have been if it were written formally. The repetition isn’t just there to show Bruno’s childish thoughts, but the society’s behaviour.
Delete(Leighton) And that is probably the feeling Boyne wanted his readers to feel. A sense of pain and awkwardness towards the extent of the so-called "Jewish question". Boyne wants to plant it into the reader's brain so they are reminded of the hopeless state that many of the Jewish people experienced as they suffered and were tortured under the Nazi soldiers, and that is shown through Gretel in a different manner, but they pretty much hold the same message. It may get annoying but that is the beauty of word art, it allows the brain the function in a critical way so that sense of annoyance allows you to think about what you are reading more carefully.
Delete(Teodora) Yes, there seems to be more than just one function towards the repetition of Hopeless Case. In ways it does comment on the nature of society, such as the inaction of many people during the war (other then the soldiers and very few heroes of the Holocaust). The inactivity of humans in crucial moments of history can be viewed as a "Hopeless Case" as well.
DeleteTeodora Marginean
ReplyDeleteThis novel was tragic yet insightful from beginning to end. It is a very original fable crafted around a very popular topic; Boyne’s description of the Holocaust was heartbreaking but naïve as well because of Bruno’s age. His character is reminiscent of Misha, an eight-year-old boy in Milkweed by Jerry Spinelli. Despite the war and inhumane treatment of Jews occurring around them, Misha and Bruno never understand the consequences of the Holocaust. Their perspective gives the reader a false sense of hope that they will be safe, even under impossible circumstances. I really enjoyed the fresh perspective this book offered.
Erin Ford
DeleteUntil I read your comment I didn’t realize that while reading I didn’t believe Bruno would die. Before reading the book I knew that it was very likely the main character would die, seeing as it was a book about the Holocaust. Despite this I did not believe Bruno would die until I read the last chapter. As you said it was his innocent perspective that gave me a false sense of security. There were many times when I though Bruno would get into trouble or Shmuel would die, but I refused to believe that Bruno would die.
Daniel Morelli
DeleteHey Teodora, I completely agree with your blog post. The Boy in the Striped Pajamas is an original tale of the Holocaust. John Boyne wrote this novel in the perspective of a boy on the safer side of the fence. Before I was able to read the novel, I believe the protagonist was of Jewish decent. Making Bruno, a nine-year-old German boy the protagonist of a tale about the Holocaust provided a different take on this popular topic. I completely agree with this your idea that the characters Misha, and Bruno had similarities. Bruno lived next to the concentration camp for a year, but he never saw the bigger picture. He never understood his own father was responsible for killing people that had the same origin as his friend Shmuel, or that he was living next to a concentration camp. I too enjoyed this different take on the Holocaust.
Isabella Fortuna
ReplyDeleteThis book is very sad and depressing. It’s hard to believe that such cruelty and brutality actually happened in society. I thought it was genius how the author paralleled the boys from the beginning through their similar appearances and same birthdays. These connections evoked suspicions that their lives would be paralleled throughout the novel and foreshadowed the tragic ending. I also felt that the innocent childhood friendship evolving between Bruno and Shmuel really set a very powerful contrast to the corrupt ways of the adults.
Shadia Adekunte
DeleteHi Isabella,
I agree that it is truly mind-boggling to comprehend that humans had to go through such horrible and merciless treatment. Also, Boyne’s decision to make Bruno and Shmuel born on the same day was a smart one. The fact that these boys share a birthday highlights the contrasts and similarities between them while helping the reader understand the contrast between the two boy’s realities also. The contrast between the morals of Bruno and the morals of those around him is also prevalent throughout the book. When you think of it, contrast is a huge theme in the book among others.
Elisa Locantore
DeleteHi Isabella,
Even though as the reader, we understand how the underlining issue of the Holocaust is the underlining theme of the story. However, in the eyes of Bruno and Shmuel they view their encounter as a moment of friendship and comfort. One can say that their friendship is like a rose surrounded by thorns. A beautiful friendship is blooming trying to survive even though the thorns of the situation make it difficult. Shmuel and Bruno are similar in many ways which is why they wondered and questioned why one of them was living a life of luxury while the other was destined for death. I agree with you that the boy’s connections had foreshadowed the tragic ending. It is difficult to believe that the innocent children have a much better perspective to the Holocaust than the immoral and unjust adults. I feel that Bruno and Shmuel would have been very close friends if the ways of the Holocaust did not ultimately determine their fate.
Ivan Tockovski
ReplyDeleteThe title of the novel itself highlights the susceptibility of the young mind of Bruno. As I preceded through the novel, I was just as unaware of the future that was unfolding in front of Bruno, as was Bruno himself. The novel appeals to me in the aspect that Boyne was able to characterize the narration as that of the realistic mind of a child, a mind that does not recognize the hidden elements of a situation, such as war. All in all, it allowed me to gain sense of how things are not always as they seem to be.
Hi Ivan,
DeleteI also think that the design of the book cover displayed Bruno’s mind; simple and oblivious. I agree with you that the novel was unexpected. The aspect of suspense forced me to continue reading. I also agree with you that Boyne has greatly portrayed Bruno’s cluelessness of the situation. It reminds me of how even the Pacers can over-think a simple-minded question, and end up getting it wrong. I guess it goes to show that “you can’t judge a book by its cover”.
That is very true. I never really looked at it that way, but now that you mention it seems to fit perfectly with the themes and tones of the book. It seems Boyne attempts to put that perspective into the minds of the readers as it does give them the opportunity to see how the Nazi's had judged the Jewish people by their covers and refused to see them as just other fellow human beings.
DeleteJuan Leikis
ReplyDeleteI had never read The Boy In The Striped Pajamas before this year, so my initial thought was that this would be based around the hardship of a Jewish boy living under the oppression of the Nazi party. I was surprised to find that the novel was about a German child, Bruno, meeting a Jewish child, Shmuel, in a concentration camp in Auschwitz, referred to as Out-with, who results in him growing in maturity, as he goes from whining in a selfish fit because he is not where he wants to be, to caring for another person, even though this person was of a group that he had been taught to hate, which once again shows maturity, as Bruno did not see a difference between himself and Shmuel, to the extent that he befriends Shmuel. All in all, I believe that this is a great novel that teaches about the negative effects of prejudice throughout that part of history.
Alvin Pane
ReplyDeleteBefore reading, “The Boy in the Striped Pajamas,” I did not have high hopes for the novel. I viewed it as a boring book on an extremely depressing theme. These thoughts were completely dismissed after I read the novel. “The Boy in the Striped Pajamas” is extremely well-written, immersing the reader in a fresh new take on the Holocaust. Previously, nobody had ever thought of what the Holocaust would seem like to a 9 year old boy, and through this novel we see a completely different side of the event. I highly enjoyed John Boyne’s take on the event as it made the novel a very enjoyable and interesting read.
When I first saw this novel, unlike you I knew that it would be a good novel. The first semester academic English classes had this book as one of their novel studies, and I heard only good things about it. However, I do agree with you that it is a fresh new take on the Holocaust. Of all the books that I have read and the stories I have heard about this genocide, this is the first one that does not come from the focal point of the people getting exterminated. It made me feel sorry for some of the Germans such as Bruno who were very naïve during the Holocaust, and could not do anything to stop the atrocities that were being performed.
DeleteHey it's Andrea.
ReplyDeleteThis is the third time doing this…
After watching the movie for the first time in grade 6, I'll admit, i cried. It was a very moving story that touched my heart. It was sad to see how the innocence and ignorance of a little boy led to his own death. I think this book was a great read. I loved the ending where the author made a little sarcastic remark. I think that we all have taken something out of this book. For me, this book really shows how discrimination ruins lives. I think that after reading 'The Boy in the Striped Pajamas', we all have gained a certain level of knowledge that we will apply to our daily lives.
Hey Andrea,
DeleteLike you, I also teared up reading this story. The fact that Bruno was so oblivious to the possible consequences of digging under the fence to get to the other side was so sad. He did not realize what kind of environment he was entering. The fact that Bruno and Shmuel ended up dying together in the same way was so powerful. It makes us realize that the boys were completely equal even though the Jews were not treated the same during that era. Shmuel was probably going to end up dying anyway but the fact that Bruno died with him would make the German soldiers, especially Bruno’s parents, realize that killing any child, or human being, due to their race, culture or individuality is not acceptable. You’re right; discrimination ruins lives.
- Julia Isgro
Ornello Iannace
ReplyDeleteBefore reading The Boy in the Striped Pyjamas I had assumed it was just a book to make people feel sad and depressed. Lets say, I was wrong, this book puts the Holocaust into the perspective of someone like us in the situation. We are all frustrated by the innocence and lack of knowledge of Bruno, but we say that now knowing what is really going on. The book is well written and brings my understanding of how the Holocaust really affected people to the next level.
I think that one of the key points of this book was, in fact, to make people feel sad and depressed. The author did a good job in my case, because I felt a lot of pity for Bruno as well as all of the Jews on the other side of the fence. I do agree with you that there was much more to the novel than just depression, there was also hope shown throughout the chapters such as when Shmuel and Bruno touched hands for the first time, and also when both of them got to see each other's side of the fence. I think that Boyne used naïve Bruno as an example to show how many people from all around the world were blinded from such a catastrophic event for so long.
DeleteAnisa Thomas
ReplyDeleteThe Boy in the Striped Pajamas has a creative plot that is meaningful to readers of all ages. Bruno’s death helps us understand the consequences of racism and injustice in the world. The book makes us realize everyone is equal and beautiful in God eyes. My favourite part is Bruno and Shmuel’s friendship because it shows how easy it is to make friends and have fun, when we don’t judge people based on religion or race. Both of these boys are great role models because the world can be a truly peaceful place if we look beyond physical appearance and dig deeper.
Nicolette Gismondi
DeleteI agree with your post and how we are all equal. The novel shows how Bruno and Shmuel are a like but very different at the same time. I also agree that the Boy In The Striped Pajamas is a book for all ages because the book can be interpreted in many different ways. I like how you said the world would be a peaceful place if we looked past physical appearances just like Shmuel and Bruno. They demonstrated bravery to meet up with each other every day no matter what the consequences were.
Sara Corvinelli
DeleteHi Anisa, I feel your statement is profound, as you have clearly underscored the prejudices that still exist in today’s society. I agree that the author demonstrated to us, through the innocence of Bruno, that there can be harmony in this world amongst people from diverse backgrounds. Unfortunately, Bruno paid the ultimate price (death) for the ignorance of others who participated in the great injustices. The world could be a better place to live in if we followed the example set by Bruno and Shmuel’s friendship.
Hey Anisa,
DeleteI also think that reading about the death and suffering during World War 2 had touched and affected many people as it did to me. Racism is an ongoing problem in the world and this book helps us realize that it is unnecessary and the consequences outweigh the injustice. Bruno and Shmuel's friendship is honest and real and it was refreshing to read this story line because the outcome of their friendship was unlikely under the circumstances.
Julia Isgro
ReplyDeleteWhen we first began to read this novel, I realized how innocent children are of all the ugly things in our world. Bruno was completely unaware of the things going on around him. It made me think back to when I was his age and how I also used to be naive. I found the book very humbling. I felt pity for Bruno and for the Jews that had to endure and survive this horrible event in history. Although it made me sad, I truly enjoyed the novel and am glad that I read it because it widened my knowledge of the time of the Holocaust and it made me appreciate how fortunate I am.
Shadia Adekunte
DeleteHi Julia,
I completely agree with your blog post. The Boy in the Striped Pajamas definitely reminded me of when I was young and naïve, much like Bruno. His character definitely seems to have proper morals that seemed to be lacking around him. It is also true that children nowadays are shielded from the terrible things that happen in the world, in order to help keep their innocence intact. Unfortunately, Bruno didn’t have this pleasure because his father took it away from him. Boyne uses perfectly crafted words to make his readers feel pathos for both Bruno and the Jews. The Boy in the Striped Pajamas is also a good tool that helps us realize just how fortunate we are to live where we do.
Andre Dao
DeleteI find what you said about innocent children being surrounded by the ugly things of the world to be interesting. I full believe that children have clean slates, they're hearts and minds are pure. It is the influence that they receive growing up that allows them to shape their own ideals and beliefs. Bruno most likely would've grown to hate Jews if he had not met Shmuel because of his family influence.
I could not agree more with the points you've made! The reader's eyes are truly opened by Bruno's innocence and naïve views on the world around him. He exemplifies the way children have such strong faith in humanity and believe that we all are good people. If only we all saw one another through children's eyes.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteIssabella Orlando
ReplyDeleteI thought that the writing style of the novel The Boy In The Striped Pyjamas was much unlike any other story I've ever read about the Holocaust. It was extremely intriguing to look at the events that occurred through the eyes of Bruno, a German child. As the story progressed, I grew more and more attached to his character which made the ending of the story even more devastating. Bruno and Shmuel's deaths were unexpected and left me particularly speechless, taken aback and in utter shock. In my opinion John Boyne conveyed a powerful message and expressed the magnitude of the devastation and cruelty that occurred during the Holocaust extremely well.
I also appreciate the writing style of the author. I believe that John Boyne is very creative and witty; he chose a writing style that captivates the attention of both the young and the old. I particularly liked the fact that he chose not to name the concentration camp nor name the leader of the political party of that time. John Boyne was very particular in choosing specific words out of respect for all Holocaust victims, yet he was still successful in conveying a very powerful message.
DeleteClaudia Miele
DeleteI agree with you about the point of view, it was interesting to read about the Holocaust through the eyes of a German soldier's young son, and very different from Anne Frank, for example. Bruno was a very likeable protagonist for the most part, however at certain points in the novel his innocence was frustrating. For example, everyone around him knows what is happening, except him, which ultimately leads to his death. As for John Boyne's style of writing, I am not a fan. For such a serious plot, the writing is very simple and at times childish.
“Those people… well, they’re not people at all, Bruno." This quote basically summarizes what the whole book is about. It shows how the Germans discriminated against the Jews; I could not imagine the atrocities that the Jews had to endure during the Holocaust. It is through the power of this quote that the author is trying to convince the audience to think differently; everyone in this world should be treated equally. We should learn to respect all "differences" and not to discriminate. Humanity should embrace people on both sides of the fence. Let's tear down fences and build bridges instead!
ReplyDeleteI agree that the quote really does summarize what really did happen during the holocaust. I feel that John Boyne tried to push the fact of how the Jewish were mistreated during the war and that one of the main themes in this book is accepting people regardless of what their background is. In the novel, the description of Shmuel is scrawny, usually injured, and dressed poorly which was the opposite of Bruno’s who was a boy of German descent. Throughout the novel Bruno shows that he unlike his father, although a clueless 9 year old boy he overlooked the difference he and Shmuel had in physical stature, religious beliefs, wealth and home life.
DeleteDaniel Morelli
DeleteHey Francesco, I completely agree with your blog post. I believe the quote summarizes the entire novel. I believe this quote and symbols such as the fence display the theme of division. The fence separated the Jewish, and the German soldiers. The German soldiers placed the Jewish people in concentration camp for revenge, and to “correct history”. In my opinion, revenge and violence is never the solution yet the German’s found that as the only solution. On the front cover of some editions of this novel, it states, “Fences like this exists all over the world. We hope you never have to reach such a fence.” In the world, many people are suffering from discrimination as the Jews were discriminated by the German soldiers.
The quote truly does depict the overall story. Bruno's father is trying to influence him into believing something which is not true; in essence, Bruno is the representation of the German people at the time of the Holocaust meanwhile his father is Nazi Party who is trying to distortion the German people's views towards the Jews.
DeleteFurthermore, I completely agree with your view on embracing people no matter which side of the fence they are on. When speaking about 'a fence', the author does not only mean a literal fence, but is also trying to invoke the thought of a metaphorical barrier. Today, it is not as much of the walls that divide us (though indeed they still do stand, for example: Israel and Palestine) as the differences that set us apart. Take Rwanda as an illustration for their has been infighting there between the Hutu and Tutsi races for many decades, and yet continues. We are called to aid in such circumstances as to avoid the Holocaust once again, yet many times, we give a blind eye to what is really happening in the world in order to maintain our clean and innocent thoughts of what is around us.
Aidan Pigott
ReplyDeleteI originally thought that the main character of this novel would be someone on the Jewish side of the wall, and not in the perspective of someone in safe Germany. Once I realized that Bruno was German and that he was on the safe side of the wall, I asked myself: what will such a naïve 8 year old do once he realizes that his own father was killing and torturing innocent people while on his side of the fence they were having lavish dinners and balls with the Jews as their servants.
This comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteWhen I started to read the book, I also believed that Bruno would have been a Jewish boy because usually in the books about the holocaust they recount the events that happened. Usually this will attain the sympathy of the reader in order to sell more copies, but because the viewpoint of this novel was different and unique to the any others it allowed him to sell a lot of copies too. About the question you asked yourself, I would think that if Bruno did find out about how his father was killing his best friends family (Shumel), he would have started to resent his father, and become rebellious.
DeleteExpecting Bruno to realize the things his father is doing to these Jewish people is a feeling we are meant to feel throughout the novel. As much as I thought this would occur, I realized the innocence of Bruno and how if he had seen these things it wouldn't make for much of a story. I also believe that we are suppose to read the story out of Bruno's eyes and just follow along the story of this little boy without knowing what is really occurring.
DeleteActually I think otherwise. I think that if Bruno had known what had been going on, the author still would have created a proper story with an interesting plot. I think that Bruno was too innocent, and that the author may have created Bruno this way because he would like it to appeal to the audience he was intending it for. Nowadays, at eight years old I do think that children are naive and innocent like Bruno and the author wanted those children to connect with the characters in the book through the eyes of someone like them.
DeleteAlvin Pane
DeleteI too found it weird that Boyne would write the story from the perspective of a German boy. However, at the same time, I feel like it made the story better. It was a very interesting and new take on the Holocaust and it made the story that much more interesting. As Ornello stated, Boyne uses Bruno's innocence to expect us to feel that Bruno should realize what his father is doing to the Jewish prisoners. Many times throughout this novel I felt bad for Bruno because of his naivety and I wished that he could have know the truth before, unfortunately, it became too late.
Hey! Doreen Sangaraganesan here. This is my first blog post, I would like to apologize for the it being delayed.
ReplyDeleteOne aspect of the novel that I couldn’t quite grasp was the reasoning behind Bruno being so innocent. He, even though he had been surrounded by the war scenarios and the suppression of Jewish people his entire life, did not know what had being going on at the Auschwitz camp. In some cases I think that he may have been too naive for his own good. What was the author’s reasoning for creating Bruno’s character the way he did? I don’t believe that at eight years, with such a surrounding, you could be oblivious to what was going on, especially inside Auschwitz. I would also like to know why the author created the book for such a young audience.
I agree with you Doreen. I don't understand why the author made Bruno so innocent. He should have gotten the idea that something weird was going on. Someone should have told him what was really going on because if he knew he would stay away from the camp. I understand that he is only nine, but he should have gotten the slightest bit of a clue. Even with Schumel telling him that it wasn't safe he still went over anyway, and that's what he gets for doing so.
DeleteIn the story, Bruno was made to be innocent in order to be the representation of the majority of German people at the time of the Holocaust. Many of them knew that the Jews were being stripped of their homes and being sent elsewhere, yet at the same time they did not know the living conditions of them. This is shown in the movie when a video displaying a concentration camp is played; the propaganda used was trying to refrain the people from knowing the true horrors of the Nazis. In addition, a large portion of Germans at the time also turned a blind eye to the subject of the Holocaust, in order to preserve what they had left of their 'innocence'.
DeleteAll your comments show maturity iof the subject matter and a love of literature and learning. I really appreciate the fact that you are all respectful of each other's comments/opinions. I see everyone accepting, tolerating, and embracing differences...you've got it! That's why we're on this blog. Stay tuned for our next step: the Ted Talk, it's amazing, informative and I promise you that you'll be thinking about it for a few days. Do single stories really exists in our minds? How did they get there? Who constructed them? Are they totally off?
ReplyDeleteHow do they influence the way we perceive others?
Remember: the word prejudice is made up of two root words:
Pre - meaning before/prior
Judizio - meaning to judge
So do we judge others before we"walk in their shoes/crawl under their skin" ? (the lesson taught by Atticus Finch in To Kill A Mockingbird) to his son and daughter. Don't forget the prejudice that existed in Maycomb County; especially at the trial of Tom Robinson and Mayella Ewell. Happty blogging everyone.
A lot of you are commenting and questioning the boys' curiosity. Well, if I was a young boy in a new home and saw a fence behind my backyard, I'd be just as curious. I can imaging not trying to join my new friend on the other side of the fence; especially, a new friend that looks peculiar because of his unique dress (striped pajamas), unique hair cut, and mysterious life beyond the fence.
ReplyDeleteI agree with many of you that say that it is a unique perspective...it certainly is!
Victoria Battaglia
ReplyDeleteI feel that the short TED film we watched today in English class can easily relate to The Boy in The Striped Pajamas. The film was a young woman who was from Nigeria and she immigrated to the United States, while struggling to adapt to a new culture that she knew nothing about. I feel that her struggles can relate to The Boy in The Striped Pajamas due to the fact that when Bruno had to leave his home to move to a much less appealing home known as the 'Out-With', he had struggled to adapt to the new conditions. I feel that after watching this short film, not only can I relate it to The Boy in The Striped Pajamas, however, I can relate it to my family. For instance, when my father immigrated from Calabria, Italy, he didn't know how to speak English and he struggled to adapt to the new conditions of Canada. Nevertheless, for each of these stories, they all end with us appreciating different cultures once we self-educate ourselves about their living styles and way of life.
Alvin Pane
ReplyDeleteI really enjoyed the TED talk film we watched today. I like the way the speaker compared prejudging somebody to a "single story" and that you have to know all of somebody's stories before it is fair to formulate on opinion on them. Way too many times in our society do we judge people simply based on one story, especially in high school, where rumours are prevalent. Someone may tell you a bad story about someone you've never met and that one story will wholly determine how you think of them. This, of course, is unjust to the person as you are prejudging them without having met them. The message of the TED talk relates to The Boy in the Striped Pajamas as Nazi Germany viewed the Jews based only on one story, the opinion of Adolf Hitler, and this prejudice resulted in the death of many innocent people.
Teresa Raso
ReplyDeleteComing from an Italian background, I was submerged in stereotypes towards other cultures. The older Italian generations isolated themselves and only interacted with other Italians. People were expected to marry an Italian family and keep the traditions and Italian genes everlasting. Now things have changed, my parents for example are not as strict, but there are still traces of stereotypes towards African people or even certain areas that had been dominated by a particular race. One thing I learned today was to not listen to one story, one point of view. It saddens me to see how many people live based on impressions or things they were taught or exposed to as children. We limit ourselves because of stereotypes and “fears” that have been passed down. We subconsciously judge people or places or things based on our narrow knowledge. There may be things we can learn from an African American who lived a normal life just like us, but because of our self pride and sheltered world we won’t get the opportunity to talk to them. Racism is the reason for the Holocaust. When relating these stereotypes back to The Boy in the Stripped Pajamas, we all know that Hitler hated the Jewish race. We may never know exactly why, but to make such a bold action and kill so many innocent people based on one persons attitude or tradition or rude encounter doesn't justify killing a whole race. Hitler didn't know every one of those Jews personally and he doesn't know their story. Don’t judge a book by its cover; listen to its story first.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete